Legal Opinion

RM v. Baxter Ex Rel. TM

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2001No. 97-1347PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice:

We granted allocatur to determine whether 23 Pa.C.S. § 5313 confers standing upon a grandparent to file a complaint for custody and/or visitation of a grandchild after the child has been adjudicated dependent. The trial court held that a grandparent lacks standing under these circumstances and dismissed the complaint. The Superior Court reversed and remanded, holding that the statute confers automatic standing upon a grandparent to seek physical and legal custody of a grandchild. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

T.M. was born on March 9,1996. The child resided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. BurnsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Herron v. SeizakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Pennsylvania AFL-CIO v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Martinez v. BaxterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Peters v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. D.G. v. D.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API