RM v. Baxter Ex Rel. TM
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice:
We granted allocatur to determine whether 23 Pa.C.S. § 5313 confers standing upon a grandparent to file a complaint for custody and/or visitation of a grandchild after the child has been adjudicated dependent. The trial court held that a grandparent lacks standing under these circumstances and dismissed the complaint. The Superior Court reversed and remanded, holding that the statute confers automatic standing upon a grandparent to seek physical and legal custody of a grandchild. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
T.M. was born on March 9,1996. The child resided…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BurnsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Herron v. SeizakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pennsylvania AFL-CIO v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Martinez v. BaxterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by34 opinions
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Peters v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- D.G. v. D.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.