Legal Opinion

Fairclough v. Salt Lake County

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1960No. 9140PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from denial of a motion to dismiss filed by Salt Lake County and the Utah Road Commission. Sovereign immunity was claimed as a defense. Reversed.

In November, 1956, defendants completed a highway project where the grade allegedly was reduced about 16 feet below plaintiffs' abutting land. Presumably it was a reasonable and necessary exercise of the police power to benefit the community as a whole.

In June, 1959, two and one-half years later, plaintiffs sued defendants 1) : to get damages for depreciation in preventing access, or, alternatively, 2) : for a writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Bingham v. BD. OF ED. OF OGDEN CITYUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cobia v. Roy CityUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Farmers New World Life Insurance Co. v. Bountiful CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Holt v. Utah State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API