Legal Opinion
Hilliger v. Golden
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1980No. Civ. 56270PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIMERMAN, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from an order taxing costs. The order did not allow costs for experts who testified on her behalf at trial.
Facts
Francene Golden, while driving her mother’s car had an accident with the plaintiff. Plaintiff sued Francene Golden, the driver, and Marilyn Golden, the owner of the car.
On April 26, 1977, plaintiff served on Francene Golden, an offer to compromise in the sum of $14,999.99 pursuant to section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This offer was not acted upon by defendant.
On July 3, 1978, plaintiff served on Marilyn Golden, an offer to compromise…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Brown v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Randles v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stallman v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Wickware v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Glende Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Slothower v. No. California Inalliance CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014