Legal Opinion
Wickware v. Tanner
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1997No. D022297PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Plaintiff Tracy Wickware (Wickware) appeals an order granting a motion to tax costs filed by defendants John Tanner, Dawnelle Tanner and Cox Properties, Inc. (sometimes collectively referred to as Tanner) and denying Wickware’s motion for leave to file an amended cost memorandum, for reconsideration and for modification of the judgment.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
Wickware rented an apartment in a building owned by John Tanner and Dawnelle Tanner. The building was managed by Cox Properties, Inc. Wick-ware slipped and fell in her apartment and allegedly suffered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Santantonio v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Taing v. Johnson Scaffolding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stallman v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Duale v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Strong v. American Cyanamid Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- MENEES v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.