Legal Opinion
Crofoot v. Giannini
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1949PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
Defendant, Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, appearing specially has moved to set aside the service of the summons herein and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that said defendant cannot, without its consent, be subjected to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State. Defendant’s contention is based on section 94 of title 12 of the United States Code (the last sentence of U. S. Rev. Stat., § 5198). Under said section actions against a national banking association “ may be had * * * in any State * * * in which said association is located ”. In interpreting this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Leonardi v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Robinson v. . National Bank of NewberneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Talmage v. . Third Nat'l B'k of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Monarch Wine Co. v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rabinowitz v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Chaffer v. Glens Falls National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
- Sulil Realty Corp. v. Rye Motors, Inc., New York County Courts1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.