Legal Opinion
Wright v. Bragg
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 3, 1899No. 574PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The declaration in this case is in trover for the recovery of possession of a note and mortgage. The action was brought by James H. Farnsworth against Phinelan B.-Haber, but on the defendant’s motion, and showing that he had possession only as executor of the last will of Eliza O. Farnsworth, the payee of the note and mortgage, and that Ella Wright claimed to be the devisee and owner thereof under the will, the latter was substituted as defendant in the case, appeared and answered, and joined the plaintiff in a written stipulation for the trial of the case by the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wesson v. Saline CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- British Queen Min. Co. Of Colorado v. Baker Silver Min. CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Daube v. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Austin v. Hamilton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- State v. WorleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Keene Mach. Co. v. BarrattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Bragg v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902