British Queen Min. Co. Of Colorado v. Baker Silver Min. Co
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF COLORADO. The case is stated in the opinion. Argument was begun on behalf of the plaintiff in error, but the court, on examining the record, declined to hear further argument.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Puller
This case was tried by the Circuit Court, without a jury, and under §§ 649 and 700, Rev. Stat., the finding must be “ either general or special.” It cannot be both. Here there was a general finding.
The record contains a bill of exceptions, but no exceptions to the rulings of the court in the progress of the trial of the cause were thereby duly presented, and although after reciting the evidence it is therein stated that “ the court thereafter and during the said term made the following findings of fact and judgment thereon,” which is followed by an opinion of the court assigning reasons for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Flanders v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- British Queen Mining Co. v. Baker Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Wesson v. Saline CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- Sayward v. Dexter, Horton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Rhodes v. United States Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.