Legal Opinion

Daube v. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 4, 1897No. 323PublishedCited by 11 opinions

. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

This was ah action in assumpsit by the Philadelphia & Beading Coal & Iron Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania, defendant in error, against. Louis Daube, the plaintiff in error, upon a contract of guaranty of which the following is a copy:

“Chicago, Ill., June 14, 1892. For the purpose of enabling Daube & Rosenheim to purchase coal on credit from the Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company, of Chicago, I hereby guaranty that said Daube & Rosenheim shall promptly pay to' it, at the expiration of the time of credit given, for all coal it has sold or may hereafter sell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. McElwee v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  5. Wesson v. Saline CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  2. Spokane & I. E. R. Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Baltimore & O. S. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  4. Hubshman v. Louis Keer Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Wright v. BraggCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API