Legal Opinion

Siemietkowski v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 25, 2009No. 08-298CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*194OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion by the United States (“government” or “defendant”) to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In the alternative, the government seeks judgment on the administrative record pursuant to RCFC 52.1.

The plaintiff, John J. Siemietkowski (“Mr. Siemietkowski”), an Army Reserve Judge Advocate General (“JAG”) officer,1 claims that the government acted…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reilly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Toon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. House v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API