House v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEGRA, Judge:
While a Navy officer, the plaintiff in this military pay case was court-martialed on charges relating to the sexual assault of a sailor. Subsequently, he resigned from the Navy. After the filing of this case, investigations revealed that the DNA evidence used to convict plaintiff was faulty (and perhaps fraudulent), leading the Navy Judge Advocate General to set aside plaintiffs conviction. At issue is whether plaintiffs resignation from the Navy prevents him from receiving compensation under the Military Back Pay Act. For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that it…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014