Legal Opinion

Corus Staal BV v. Department of Commerce

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 21, 2005No. 2004-1107PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Corus Staal BV and Corus Steel USA Inc. (collectively “Corus”) appeal the judgment of the Court of International Trade, Corus Staal BV v. Dep’t of Commerce, 283 F.Supp.2d 1357 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2003), affirming the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce’s”) zeroing methodology to calculate the weighted-average dumping margin for imports of Corus’ hot-rolled carbon steel flat products (“hot-rolled steel”) from the Netherlands. We affirm.

Background,

On December 4, 2000, Commerce initiated an antidumping duty investigation of alleged less-than-fair-value sales of hot-rolled steel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  4. Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Timken U.S. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API