Legal Opinion

Knox v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1929No. Docket No. 6668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

So far as this proceeding is concerned, the essential facts are that in an action instituted by petitioner Knox in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside (No. 17914 of the files of said court) against one Wyman and Title Guarantee and Trust Company, a corporation, each of said defendants failed to answer the complaint therein, and the default of each of them was regularly taken and judgment entered. About five months later, under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Title Guarantee and Trust Company, a corporation, as trustee, and one Aamoth, individually (the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Wheelock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Glougie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Evry v. TrembleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Bullard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Jones v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Kessler v. HayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API