Legal Opinion

State v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 2001No. 99-1159PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

Mary Kathlyn Burgess kept money paid by her customers for decorating services she never rendered. Burgess entered an Alford plea to a charge of theft by misappropriation. The Iowa Court of Appeals dismissed the charge without prejudice to allow the State to re-indict Burgess. See Burgess v. State, 585 N.W.2d 846, 848 (Iowa Ct.App.1998). The State then filed a trial information charging Burgess with theft by deception. Again, Burgess entered an Alford plea to the charge. She now appeals from her conviction and sentence for third-degree theft by deception. Iowa Code §§ 714.1(3),…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Eddie TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State of Iowa v. Orlando David RodriguezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Lacinda Ranee Van HaaftenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API