Legal Opinion

Voorhies v. Pratt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Genesee; Stevens, J. Bill by George W. Voorhies against William Pratt and others to restrain defendants from the use of certain drains and for damages arising out of their use. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

George Voorhies, the plaintiff, is the owner of 30 acres of farming land in the southwest corner of the township of Fenton, in Genesee county. Defendants’ lands lie to the north and east of plaintiff’s, forming a watershed of something less than 100 acres, which discharges its surface water on and across plaintiff’s land to the southwest. Several months after plaintiff purchased the land in November, 1911, he'discovered two tile drains discharging their waters on his land. One drain from the north was laid on his land about 12, rods and ran back onto defendants’ land several rods. The other,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cranson v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wylie v. GambleMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Vanden BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Sallan Jewelry Co. v. BirdMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API