Legal Opinion
Colon v. Multi-Pak Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 7, 2007No. 05 Civ. 3630(RWS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendant, Multi-Pak Corporation (“Multi”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiffs, Domingo Colon (“Colon”) and Luz A. Colon (collectively, the “Colons”). The complaint alleges that Multi is liable under theories of negligence, strict product liability, and express and implied warranty for personal injuries suffered by Colon while operating a garbage compactor. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bricklayers & Masons Local Union No. 5 Ohio Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- City of Syracuse v. Loomis Armored US, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Vicuna v. O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.