Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1904No. 3330Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Division A.

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.

A policy of fire insurance covering various classes of property describing it separately as per example: first, the store building; second, the stock of merchandise, and third, the store fixtures; and specifying separate amounts on each class, is not avoided by a breach of the iron safe clause as to any property included *223in the contract, except that covered by the forfeiture clause which in this case is that which was required to be inventoried and a record made of the business concerning which books of accounts were required to be kept, to wit: the stock of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Germier v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Roberts, Willis & Taylor Co. v. Sun Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Sun Mutual Insurance v. TuftsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Vinal v. Continental Construction & Improvement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sands v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API