Legal Opinion

Vinal v. Continental Construction & Improvement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Saratoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

We think that the opinion of the learned justice who decided the case is sound and able, and that it is really of little use to add anything to what he has said so well.

Tiie complaint speaks of a written and verbal agreement between Burt and the construction company. The appellant urges that no verbal agreement could be proved, for the reason that the written paper must be understood to embrace the whole agreement between the parties. That is a matter to be determined on the offer of proof at the trial. If testimony of a verbal agreement is offered and objected to, and if it "ought not to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steinbach v. . Relief Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Carpentier v. MinturnNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Holdredge v. WebbNew York Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Orth v. KaescheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HolzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. Hirsch v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API