Legal Opinion

Sun Mutual Insurance v. Tufts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Ellis. Tried below before Hon. J. E. Dillard.

1Opinion of the Court

KAIHEY, Associate Justice.

Appellant insurance company issued to Brooks Bros., interveners below, a policy insuring against loss by fire for $1180, covering a soda fountain and fixtures for $650, carpets, tables, chairs, etc., for $150, and stock of candies, confectioneries, etc., for $350, with loss payable to J. W. Tufts as his interest might appear. Said property was destroyed by fire during the life of the policy. The appellant declined to pay the loss and J. W. Tufts brought suit, alleging that said policy was delivered to him though not formally indorsed; that he had a lien on the soda…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. LadinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Fisher v. Sun InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. West Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Creem v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API