Legal Opinion
Roberts, Willis & Taylor Co. v. Sun Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 11, 1896No. 881PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLY, Associate Justice.
— In the above cases, which have been consolidated for the purposes of this appeal, appellants, as assignees of Burge & Allen, the parties insured, brought suits to recover on two insurance policies executed by the respective insurance companies, one being for $1500 on a stock of general merchandise, the other for $600 on the same personal property, and for $400 on the frame house in which the merchandise was contained. The policies were assigned to appellants after the loss. The case was tried, with a jury, and the judge instructed the jury that “The undisputed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Merrill v. . Agricultural Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Gish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Roberts, Willis & Taylor Co. v. Sun Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Miller v. Delaware Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Palmer v. Town of FarmingtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.