Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2007No. 71A04-0704-CR-234PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

Appellant-defendant Bruce Howard appeals his conviction for Burglary, 1 a class B felony. Specifically, Howard argues that (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction, (2) the trial court erroneously believed it could not suspend any portion of his sentence because he was a habitual offender, and (3) his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his character. Although we find that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient and that Howard’s sentence is not inappropriate, the trial court incorrectly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. O'CONNELL v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Maul v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bauer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Kilgore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Jacob O. Robinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Darryl Calvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Darryl Calvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API