Legal Opinion

Bauer v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 2007No. 92A05-0704-PC-229PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Joseph Bauer, pro se, appeals the denial of his motion to correct erroneous sentence. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Issues

Bauer raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

I.Whether his claims are appropriately raised in a motion to correct erroneous sentence; and

II. Whether the trial court dealt with his habitual substance offender enhancement improperly by treating it as a separate conviction.

We also, sua sponte, address the following issue:

III. Whether the trial court may properly suspend any portion of the sentence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wise v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Pagan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Reffett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Robert D. Davis v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Fry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Scott Grundy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Matthew L. Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Young v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API