Legal Opinion

Keller v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1988No. CA A46742PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Petitioners, officials of the City of Klamath Falls, seek review of the Commission’s order imposing on each of them a $1,132.50 penalty for their spouses’ receipt of gifts of food, lodging and travel in violation of former ORS 244.040(2).

The case was decided on stipulated facts and agreed legal issues:

“AGREED FACTS
“1. At the time of the alleged violation of \former] ORS 244.040(2), [petitioners] were public officials serving the City of Klamath Falls, Oregon, in the following capacities:
“James Keller City Manager
“Jeffrey Ball City Attorney
“George Flitcraft Mayor
“Harold Howard Council Member
“Ha…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Market Transport, Ltd. v. MaudlinOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keller v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API