Kelly v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Plaintiff, who was conducting a concrete pipe irrigation business in Kern County, entered into a contract with defendants for the trenching, laying and backfilling of a cement pipeline upon agricultural lands owned by the defendants. The pipeline was constructed to irrigate crops to be grown on the land and the work was to be done for a fixed contract price. The reasonable value of the materials furnished and the labor and services performed was $3,899.45. Upon the failure of the defendants to pay for the work and materials, plaintiff commenced the instant action to foreclose a lien filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mantzoros v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Bowline v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- The Robin GoodfellowDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fraenkel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Currie v. StolowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Davis v. Pine Mountain Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Salter v. Kindom Uranium CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. Cnty. of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.