Davis v. Pine Mountain Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $217,500 in an action for damages for personal injury.
Questions Presented(a) Do the equipment exemptions provided in section 25802 of the Vehicle Code apply to the forklift?(b) Should “safe place to work" instructions have been given ?(e) As the forklift driver was released from liability, were instructions on respondeat superior proper ?
Record
Defendant’s driver was driving a forklift and' plaintiff a “carrier” (both equipment used to haul lumber) on a public road in Siskiyou County. Both were going in the same…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Fraenkel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Degraff v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Minnesota Bearing Co. v. White Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Sanders v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Royster v. MontanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Campbell v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.