Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1940No. 9390PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge,

This action is to recover upon a policy of war risk insurance issued to the appellant. The appellant claims he became totally and permanently disabled before the policy lapsed on September 20, 1929. The trial was by the court without a jury. The new rules of civil procedure in the federal courts were then in effect. At the close of the appellant’s evidence the defendant (appellee) rested and moved for a dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff had not produced sufficient evidence to show that “he was suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis, active, or from any other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. KleverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Crews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Granite Partners, LP v. Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Negrón-Almeda v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Barnum v. Millbrook Care Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API