Legal Opinion

Negrón-Almeda v. Santiago

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 5, 2008No. 07-2013, 07-2140PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge.

Following a jury verdict in an employment discrimination case premised on a claim of political connivance, the district court used its equitable powers to augment the verdict. That action, along with the court’s refusal to allow the affected public corporation to intervene in the post-verdict proceedings, have produced a series of conundra, with which we must now grapple.

After careful consideration of a meandering record, we reverse the court’s grant of equitable relief in the nature of both reinstatement and backpay. Recognizing, however, that there is still work…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Grajales v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Rodriguez-Garcia v. Miranda-MarinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Pagán-Colón v. Walgreens of San Patricio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API