Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Iowa Dairy Separator Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — Hon. Franklin O. Platt, Judge. Action for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

Master and servant : “knowledge” as element of negligence: usual manner of work: poison. This is an action brought by an employee of a manufacturing corporation to recover damages on account of a disease claimed to have been contracted as a result of the use of certain acid and oils negligently furnished by his employers.

The record discloses that the plaintiff was about sixty-two years old; had worked for the defendant in its factory at various jobs, since November 15, 1907. For a number of months immediately prior to the beginning of his illness, he had been putting spacers in cones. This is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Pinkley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Gould v. Slater Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Kitteringham v. Sioux City & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Corcoran v. WanamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maggelet's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Grammer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Voshall v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Russo v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Koetsier v. Cargill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API