Koetsier v. Cargill Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Defendant is engaged in the printing, engraving and binding business in the city of Grand Rapids. In a separate room it has two monotype casters and two monotype keyboards. These mono-type casters cast the'type from molten metal, 75 per cent, of which is lead, heated to between 700 and 725 degrees. Some dross accumulates on the top which is skimmed off by the operator. The used type, dross, and accumulations of metal with the sweepings are remelted in the furnace room and cast into pigs which go to the operating room. Plaintiff before he attained his majority entered the employ of defendant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw Railroad v. GildersleeveMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Hewitt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evinger v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Layton v. Cregan Mallory Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Curley v. Beryllium CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Evinger v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954