Legal Opinion

Voshall v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

A review of the ruling of the trial court in refusing to take the case from the jury involves a consideration of the question as to whether there is any evidence tending to show that the alleged negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. Defendant, in support of the motions above stated, among other things, contended: (1) There was no proof of any negligence on its part; (2) no proof that the defendant knew of the dangerous character of the brass polish; and (3) no proof that the brass polish, assuming it to be poisonous, was the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Thompson v. United Laboratories Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Wagner v. H. W. Jayne Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Matter of CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robert John Gulden v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, Gregory Steele v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation, a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Shelton v. LOWELLOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gillilan v. Portland Crematorium Assn.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Austin v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Brady v. Oregon Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API