Legal Opinion

Sinard v. Patterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1834PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Patterson against Sinard. The declaration contains several counts. The first count is on a special contract respecting the sale and delivery of bricks. The other counts are general ones for bricks sold and delivered.

The defendant pleaded three pleas. First, non-assumpsit. Secondly, actio non: for that on, &c. at, &c. before the commencement of the suit, the defendant paid to the plaintiff the several-sums in the declaration mentioned, together with all interest due thereon, according to the form and effect of the several promises and undertakings in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jewell v. SchroeppelNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Allen v. JaquishNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. People v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Lomax v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Harris v. Doe, on the Demise of BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API