Legal Opinion

Canby v. Ingersol

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Assumpsit for work and labour. Plea, the general issue. Judgment for the plaintiff.

The parties made an agreement under seal, by which Ingersol, the plaintiff below, agreed to dig certain mill-races for Ganby, the defendant below, in a particular manner and by a specified time; and the latter agreed to pay him therefor a designated price. The work was commenced and a part of it performed, under the contract, by the time specified; a considerable portion of it, however, remained undone at that period, but was finished afterwards, with the approbation of Ganby and agreeably to his instructions.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sinard v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lomax v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Wright v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API