Legal Opinion · Dissent

McLamb v. . Beasley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1DissentClarkson, J.

Civil actions to recover damages for alleged negligent injuries, by consent consolidated and tried together, as the two actions arise out of the same state of facts.

William Hood, while driving a truck along the Smithfield-Angier highway on the night of 18 February, 1939, negligently ran into the rear of a wagon in which the two plaintiffs were riding and injured both of them. Hood was employed as a handy man around the defendant's store and was the regular driver of the delivery truck which he was using on the night in question. At the conclusion of the day's work, Hood drove the defendant's…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Hunt v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Martin v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus LineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Roberts v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Powers v. Lady's Funeral HomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Evington v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. Humphrey v. Quality Cleaners and LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API