Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1943PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWinborne, J.

This was an action to recover damages for slander. It was alleged that the defendant Little spoke of and concerning the plaintiff that she had stolen a bundle or package from defendant company's store, and further that the defamatory words were spoken while Little was acting within the scope of his employment by his codefendant as manager of the store. The defendants denied that the slanderous words alleged were spoken by defendant Little, or that the corporate defendant was liable therefor.

Upon issues submitted there was verdict that defendant Little spoke of and concerning the plaintiff, in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Stewart v. Nation-Wide Check CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Johnson v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Morpul Research Corp. v. Westover Hardware, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API