Legal Opinion

Evington v. Forbes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1984No. 83-1281PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a grant of judgment for the defendant, St. Luke’s Hospi*835tal, notwithstanding a verdict for the plaintiff in the district court. The Hospital was the employer of the other defendant, Harry Lee Forbes, III, who is not involved in this appeal. The jury, by special verdict, found that Forbes was acting as an agent of the defendant at the time of the accident for which he was found liable, thus subjecting the Hospital to liability by virtue of respondeat superior. Although the district court did not disturb the separate findings on Forbes’ negligence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Massey v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. McLamb v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. McLamb v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. John Michael Borneman v. United States of America, John Michael Borneman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. Clickner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Edens v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. Medina v. FullerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Handley v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API