Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Steed
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 21, 1985PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 24, 1985, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he had voluntarily left his employment without good cause and imposed a forfeiture of four effective days as a penalty in reduction of future benefits.
Claimant left his job as a machine operator after his supervisor instructed him to work at another machine from the one at which he was then working. According to claimant, when he refused to work on the other machine, his supervisor told him to go home and that there was no work…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Claim of ValvoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Claim of ValvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of McEvoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Claim of DounnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Claim of HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Claim of WacksmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Claim of DavidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of FilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.