Legal Opinion

Keith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1967No. 4260-4263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

After a joint trial by jury, appellants were convicted of the charges of possession of implements of crime, unlawful entry, and possession of narcotics. 1 All except appellant Walker were also convicted of narcotics vagrancy. 2 Concurrent sentences were imposed and these appeals, consolidated for hearing, followed.

The testimony disclosed that two plainclothes detectives observed appellants walk into an alley. The officers shortly followed. As they proceeded up the alley, they noted that the back door of an empty building, posted as “Vacant and Condemned,” had been knocked off its hinges and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Finnegan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  3. Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Paul Garcia Murgia, Pedro Hernandez Ramirez and Joe Ramirez Carpio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Culp v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Federov v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API