Legal Opinion

Paul Garcia Murgia, Pedro Hernandez Ramirez and Joe Ramirez Carpio v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1960No. 16811_1PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

The three appellants herein were convicted by the court below, sitting without a jury, of a conspiracy to import heroin, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and the illegal importation of narcotics, 70 Stat. 570 (1956) 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. (Two counts.) Murgia and Ramirez (also known as Hernandez) were sentenced to concurrent ten year terms; Carpió to concurrent five year terms. Upon filing a timely appeal, each appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Each was represented below and on this appeal by able counsel.

Prior to September 9, 1959, custom agents at Calexico, California,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Barbara Jean Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Yves Glaziou and Rene L. A. LemieuxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Roger Maguire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API