Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federov v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1990No. Nos. 88-240, 88-242 and 88-531Published

1DissentSchwelb, Associate Judge

There are times when jurisprudence, like politics, makes strange bedfellows. Largely for the reasons stated by my colleagues, I find myself in respectful but emphatic disagreement with the two trial judges with regard to the appropriate analysis of the principal issues in the case. I also agree with much — perhaps most — of the legal discussion in the majority opinion. Nevertheless, I am persuaded that the judgments below should be affirmed. In my opinion, appellants have not made an adequate initial showing either that they are similarly situated to those persons charged with unlawful entry…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API