Legal Opinion
Parker v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 11, 1996No. 94 CV 3939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
Anderson Parker brings this diversity action under the New York Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 290 et seq.) against his former employer, Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”), for discrimination. Presently before the Court is Chrysler’s motion, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Parker, a black male, worked for Chrysler at its facility in Tappan, New York from 1972 through 1991. The crux of Parker’s complaint is that Chrysler forced him to retire on account of his race. Critical to this summary judgment motion,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Dipol v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Leach v. DufrainDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Haskins v. N.Y.C. Department of Correctional etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019