Legal Opinion
Dipol v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1998No. 94 CV 696(SJ)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHNSON, District Judge.
Robert DiPol (“DiPol” or “Plaintiff”) filed the present action under the “Americans with Disabilities Act” (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. and New York state law against the New York City Transit Authority (“Defendant” or the “NYCTA”). Before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment against Defendant pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on Plaintiff’s ADA claim. According to Plaintiff, the material facts in this case are not in dispute and constitute proof of discrimination under the ADA, thus…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James M. Cronin v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Donna Heilweil v. Mount Sinai HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Joseph T. Myers v. Mitchell L. Hose, Director of Personnel Frederick County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joseph B. Taylor v. Pathmark Stores, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Dobrich v. General Dynamics Corp., Elec. Boat Div.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Simms v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Ragan v. JEFFBOAT, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.