Legal Opinion

Honey v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1997No. 63429-7PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

We granted review of a decision of the Court of Appeals to the effect that lessors in a long-term ground lease who subordinated their interest in the leased land to a lending institution, in order to assist the lessee in securing financing for improvements to the leasehold, were sureties for the lessee. We reverse the Court of Appeals, concluding that the lessors, under the facts of this case, are not sureties.

Dr. Robert Davis and Earl McCarthy were partners doing business as Mid-Valley Mall Ltd. (Mid-Valley), a partnership that was formed for the purpose of developing a shopping mall. In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Johnson v. JouchertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Star Equipment, Ltd. v. State of Iowa, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API