Gossett v. Farmers Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— In this action for homeowners’ insurance benefits the parties dispute the nature and extent of the insurable interest which Richard and Margaret Gossett had in an unfinished house destroyed by fire, as well as the constitutionality and propriety of attorney fees awarded under Olympic S.S. Co. v. Centennial Ins. Co., 117 Wn.2d 37, 811 P.2d 673 (1991). We affirm the trial court’s holding that the Gossetts had an insurable interest in the property only to the extent of improvements they made prior to the fire, and accordingly reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision. We uphold the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.