Legal Opinion
Rawlett v. Runyun
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 20, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-1279-APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CACHERIS, Chief Judge.
At issue in this case is the appropriate statute of limitations for an ADEA claim brought by a federal employee. Plaintiff, Thomas Rawlett, has brought this action for relief under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 633a. Defendant, Marvin Runyun, has filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. As plaintiff and defendant have asked the Court to look at material outside the pleadings the Court will treat the entire motion as one for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below the Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Stevens v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edwards v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Panyanouvong v. Vienna Wolftrap HotelDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Littell v. Aid Ass'n for LutheransCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- 68 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1121, 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,698 Gerald W. Littell, Individually and on Behalf of the Class v. Aid Association for LutheransCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995