Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Ashcroft
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 2002No. 01 CIV.9227Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On or about October 18, 2001, Eddy Abraham Martinez (“Martinez” or “Petitioner”) filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and an application to stay his removal from the United States (“Petition”) following a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, dated August 15, 2001, affirming a February 25, 2000 decision by an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). 1 The IJ had determined that Petitioner is (i) removable from the United States as an alien who was convicted of an aggravated felony and (ii) ineligible for a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Nelson v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Franklin Henderson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Engin Yesil v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Immigration and Naturalization Service John B.Z. Caplinger, District Director Nancy Hooks, Officer in Charge, Guillermo Mojica v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- DeLuca v. LordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Enrico St. Cyr v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.