Legal Opinion

Starr v. Morsette

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1975No. Civ. 9135PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Judge.

The defendants, Alfred Morsette, Jr., and Geneva Morsette, appeal from the judgment against them and from the order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. They ask for review of the denial of their motion for directed verdict at the end of the plaintiff Starr’s case and at the end of the entire case, pursuant to Section 28-27-29.1, N.D.C.C.

We affirm.

The action arose out of an automobile accident. On August 26, 1972, Geneva Sea-boy, who later became, and is hereafter named as, Mrs. Morsette, was driving a pickup truck with the plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  4. The Wealden Corporation and Edward G. Uhl v. Joseph J. SchweyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Leake v. HagertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. MotskoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kobilansky v. LiffrigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bye v. ElvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API