Legal Opinion

The Wealden Corporation and Edward G. Uhl v. Joseph J. Schwey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1973No. 72-3049PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

This is a diversity action in which plaintiffs-appellees seek damages for alleged negligence and fraud in connection with appellants’ maintenance and development of appellees’ citrus groves. The court below found that appellees suffered losses due to appellants’ fraudulent misrepresentations and ordered that appellants return a portion of the money paid by plaintiffs. We affirm.

During the period 1963-70 appellees purchased citrus groves that appellants undertook to improve, maintain and operate; they also purchased undeveloped land that defendants undertook to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. A. & N. Club, A/K/A Youngstown Garrison No. 281 Army and Navy Union, U.S.A., Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cepelak v. Sears (In Re Sears)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Doe v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Eugene Dupont, Iii, Cross v. Southern National Bank of Houston, Texas, Trustee, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Bob Maxfield, Inc. v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API