Legal Opinion

State v. Terry

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 24, 2000No. 99-2150-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

¶ 1. Samuel Terry appeals from the judgment of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, as a repeat offender, contrary to WlS. STAT. §§ 961.16(2)(b)l, 961.41(lm)(cm)2, and 961.48. He also is appealing the order denying his postconviction motion. Terry argues that, under the doctrine of issue preclusion, the State was precluded from criminally prosecuting him for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver because the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), at his probation and parole revocation proceeding, determined that there was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. CastilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. State v. BrunetSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Munger v. SeehaferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  4. Com. v. Massi, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Doan, Ex Parte DustinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API