Legal Opinion

State v. Brunet

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 10, 2002No. 00-121PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, C J.

The question presented is whether collateral estoppel bars a criminal prosecution based on factual allegations decided adversely to the State in an earlier probation revocation proceeding. We hold that it does not. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

The material facts are undisputed. In November 1998, defendant was convicted of misdemeanor domestic assault, and sentenced to three to six months. The sentence was suspended, and defendant was placed on probation with the standard conditions of probation, as well as ■ several special conditions, including requirements…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ex Parte TarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. State v. DecoteauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. State v. WatersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API