Legal Opinion

Munger v. Seehafer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 29, 2016No. 2014AP2594PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

HRUZ, J.

Bradley Munger ("Munger") and the Summit Lake Association (the "Association") appeal from judgments and an order dismissing all of Munger *761and the Association's claims against Richard Seehafer, Peter Vanderhei, Richard Hilger, and Patrick Curran (collectively, the "Respondents").1 On appeal, Munger and the Association assert the circuit court erroneously dismissed their intentional trespass and declaratory judgment claims, as well as a claim denominated "Public Nuisance and Inadequate Enforcement." They also assert the circuit court erroneously granted the Respondents summary…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robert Prunty v. Maple Valley Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
  2. State v. SchnepfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Tocci Building Corporation v. Trane U.S. Inc. a/k/a Trane CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  4. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation v. Offit Kurman PADistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  5. Wisconsin Realtors Association, Inc. v. City of NeenahCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API