United States v. Oppenheimer
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT'OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The defendant in error and others were indicted for a conspiracy to conceal assets from a trustee in bankruptcy. Act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 29; 30 Stat. 544, 554. The. defendant Oppenheirner set up a previous adjudication upon a former indictment for the same offence that it was barred by the one-year statute of limitations in the bankruptcy act for offences against that act, § 29d; an adjudication since held to be wrong in another case. United States v. Rabinowich, 238 U. S. 78. This defence was presented in four forms entitled respectively, demurrer, motion to quash, plea in abatement,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. KeitelSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by407 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
402 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.